Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 21:10
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$379
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 166
2-Core 306
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,206
109% 916 Pts
64-Core 1,764
109% 1,764 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 155
Parallax 174
132% 163 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 134
Splatting 121
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1589 2266 2280 1988 380 350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 1,786
Write 2,354
Mixed 1,962
SusWrite 1,476
428% 1,894 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 95.6
328% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1351
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 1,148
858% 1,149 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 314%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
416GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 2235 2228 2238 1290 342 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 1,772
Write 2,289
Mixed 1,960
SusWrite 1,760
440% 1,945 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 90.8
307% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,439
DQ Write 1,164
DQ Mixed 1,210
931% 1,271 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 332%
Great: 365%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 138 129 133 137 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 419
Write 149
Mixed 202
SusWrite 134
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 38.3
142% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 118
101% 150 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
119GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 206 205 206 206 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 383
Write 288
Mixed 289
SusWrite 203
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 41.6
153% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 216
163% 220 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
581GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 464 463 463 464 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 46.7
137% 47.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.9
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback