Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 06:33
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$450
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 315
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,202
108% 913 Pts
64-Core 1,761
109% 1,761 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 155
Parallax 174
132% 164 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 133
Splatting 119
117% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
625GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1553 2232 2203 2284 2292 2263 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 1,803
Write 2,342
Mixed 1,963
SusWrite 2,138
467% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 91.6
325% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 1,097
832% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 354%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
529GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2197 2220 2226 2224 2225 2223 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 1,798
Write 1,571
Mixed 1,927
SusWrite 2219
425% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 87
306% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1426
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,164
876% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 355%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
526GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 464 462 465 463 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
169GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 188 116 207 209 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 355
Write 280
Mixed 304
SusWrite 194
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 36.6
145% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 211
161% 220 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
61GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 136 144 139 134 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 417
Write 146
Mixed 196
SusWrite 136
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 24.4
89% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 101
90% 134 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 49.1
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 46.2
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 40.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 126%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $914
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback