MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211216
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 18:48
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 939
93% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,105
68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.5% Very good
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 88.4
80% 94.5 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 87.9
Splatting 74.1
69% 85.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 256 221 234 210 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,301
Write 873
Mixed 173
SusWrite 216
140% 640 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 52.6
153% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,232
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 789
586% 800 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 149%
Great: 365%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
169GB free
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 447 281 147 167 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 494
Write 458
Mixed 395
SusWrite 267
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 0.5
62% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 26.3
75% 154 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.5% Very good
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 30.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 30.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 50 165 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA7 MSI G273
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $908
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback