Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 14:55
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$450
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 85.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 324
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,213
109% 920 Pts
64-Core 1,777
110% 1,777 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 159
Parallax 160
135% 162 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
120% 150 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1535 2261 2298 2370 2369 2367 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 1791
Write 2,396
Mixed 1,982
SusWrite 2,200
474% 2,092 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 96.6
331% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,411
DQ Write 1,174
DQ Mixed 1276
960% 1287 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 366%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
479GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2223 2229 2229 2230 2222 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 2,268
Mixed 1,951
SusWrite 1,905
448% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 92.8
315% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1486
DQ Write 1,305
DQ Mixed 1,390
1,044% 1,394 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 347%
Great: 365%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 136 136 135 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 416
Write 144
Mixed 201
SusWrite 134
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 37.5
142% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 121
104% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
121GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 205 131 212 208 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 359
Write 295
Mixed 288
SusWrite 198
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 41.3
153% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 210
160% 218 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
472GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,511
Write 8,106
Mixed 8,048
1,837% 8,222 MB/s
4K Read 710
4K Write 341
4K Mixed 167
1,469% 406 MB/s
DQ Read 1,594
DQ Write 1,304
DQ Mixed 1,416
1,069% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 46.6
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.3
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback