Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 19:19
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$438
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 321
102% 190 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,198
108% 910 Pts
64-Core 1,755
109% 1,755 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 158
Parallax 160
131% 159 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
120% 150 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
498GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1532 2262 2233 2287 2270 906 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 1,800
Write 2350
Mixed 1,976
SusWrite 1915
455% 2,010 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 96.8
331% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,380
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 1,269
950% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 348%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
416GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2202 2220 2250 2237 1291 357 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 1,788
Write 2,344
Mixed 1,965
SusWrite 1,760
445% 1,964 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 93
315% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,279
DQ Mixed 1,367
1,027% 1,373 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 338%
Great: 365%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 139 153 153 151 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 443
Write 157
Mixed 210
SusWrite 144
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 37.4
142% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 120
103% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
119GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 205 204 201 150 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 382
Write 295
Mixed 288
SusWrite 196
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 42
149% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 216
163% 220 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
581GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 462 463 464 463 464 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 46.8
137% 47.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40.4
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback