Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 03:57
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$450
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,200
108% 912 Pts
64-Core 1748
108% 1748 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 156
Parallax 158
131% 158 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 135
Splatting 119
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
629GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1577 2251 2264 2309 2310 2319 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 1,801
Write 2384
Mixed 1,972
SusWrite 2,172
472% 2,082 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 91.2
324% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,399
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1,126
851% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 357%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
529GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2179 2207 2216 2221 2221 2183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 1,788
Write 1,920
Mixed 1,922
SusWrite 2,205
443% 1,959 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 85.3
302% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,425
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 1047
814% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 351%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
526GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 463 462 464 463 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
169GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 208 209 132 198 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 429
Write 250
Mixed 279
SusWrite 198
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 41.1
145% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 208
159% 217 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
61GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 135 136 133 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 410
Write 149
Mixed 203
SusWrite 134
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 26.7
92% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 122
104% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 46.8
MC Mixed 46.6
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 39.5
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback