Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 03:52
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$438
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 1,194
108% 907 Pts
64-Core 2,199
136% 2,199 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 156
Parallax 157
132% 158 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 134
Splatting 120
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1520 2258 2240 777 161 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,761
Write 1,771
Mixed 1964
SusWrite 1,194
377% 1,672 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 87.3
305% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 1,077
DQ Mixed 1,163
876% 1,174 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 290%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
416GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2202 2228 2230 2226 2227 2232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 1,742
Write 1,243
Mixed 1,932
SusWrite 2,224
403% 1,785 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 92.3
313% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 1,164
DQ Mixed 1,224
927% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 359%
Great: 365%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 135 131 134 135 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 412
Write 151
Mixed 201
SusWrite 132
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 35.2
137% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 108
95% 143 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
119GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 287 285 283 222 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 369
Write 284
Mixed 274
SusWrite 243
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 40.1
143% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 204
155% 209 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
581GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 464 463 463 464 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 46
MC Mixed 45.2
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 40.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 126%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $914
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback