Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 05:01
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$438
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 163
2-Core 326
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,221
110% 926 Pts
64-Core 1,784
110% 1,784 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 154
Parallax 158
132% 158 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 135
Splatting 119
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1551 2243 2254 2354 2359 2363 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 1,789
Write 2,351
Mixed 1,965
SusWrite 2,188
470% 2,073 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 95.6
331% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,373
DQ Write 1,162
DQ Mixed 1,254
943% 1,263 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 364%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
479GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 2237 2230 2224 2225 2224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 1,810
Write 1,303
Mixed 1,940
SusWrite 2,228
411% 1,820 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 92
313% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,469
DQ Write 1290
DQ Mixed 1,361
1,026% 1,374 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 367%
Great: 365%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 136 135 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 421
Write 150
Mixed 204
SusWrite 136
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 36
140% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 118
102% 152 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
121GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 204 177 166 212 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 330
Write 289
Mixed 299
SusWrite 201
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 38.1
148% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 204
157% 216 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
472GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 463 464 464 463 462 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 43.6
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38.4
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback