PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C56 |
Motherboard | MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) (all builds) |
Memory | 56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200831 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 01 '22 at 00:45 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
82.9%
Excellent
|
96% 181 Pts
|
82% 665 Pts
|
62% 1,002 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 6800-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E437) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.Q2
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
136%
Outstanding
|
138% 228 fps
|
158% 195 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$138
459GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 397 388 335 344 349 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
65% 287 MB/s
|
104% 38.7 MB/s
|
209% 320 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$130
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 422 412 348 372 374 MB/s
|
96.8%
Outstanding
|
75% 334 MB/s
|
137% 47.9 MB/s
|
279% 373 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
162GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 118 121 123 120 MB/s
|
66.6%
Good
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
189% 1.37 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
65.1%
Good
|
67% 23.3 GB/s
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
49% | 34% | 62 | 310 | 244 | 144 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | MSI1462 Optix MAG24C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $155Bench 96%, 206,018 samples | 3,782x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $208Bench 98%, 168,663 samples | 2,066x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $285Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 1,253x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $530Bench 148%, 562,666 samples | 1,051x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $420Bench 129%, 390,908 samples | 994x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $350Bench 100%, 301,333 samples | 941x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $974 |