Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive363% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 09:25
Run Duration371 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$438
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 319
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,200
108% 910 Pts
64-Core 1,734
107% 1,734 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 163
Parallax 164
135% 164 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 141
Splatting 126
126% 159 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 126%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1578 2228 2227 2298 2295 2301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 1,822
Write 2,338
Mixed 1,949
SusWrite 2,154
468% 2066 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 95.6
326% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1382
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,288
966% 1,290 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 363%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
357GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2225 2230 2239 1854 251 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 1,774
Write 2,241
Mixed 1,920
SusWrite 1,512
421% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 90.3
307% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,484
DQ Write 1,312
DQ Mixed 1,380
1,040% 1,392 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 321%
Great: 365%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 144 147 152 140 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61% Good
Read 430
Write 152
Mixed 206
SusWrite 139
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 26
90% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 124
105% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
123GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 286 290 285 288 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 297
Mixed 311
SusWrite 288
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 39.5
148% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 211
161% 218 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
758GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 463 464 465 464 464 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 46.8
138% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 40.3
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 128%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback