Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 04:07
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$438
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 87.7
1-Core 164
2-Core 324
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,200
108% 912 Pts
64-Core 1,748
108% 1,748 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 159
Parallax 160
134% 161 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
119% 150 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1430 2237 2205 1216 439 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 1,799
Write 2,084
Mixed 1,946
SusWrite 1,282
401% 1,778 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 95.8
328% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,358
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 1,063
807% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 302%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
416GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2223 2246 2247 2235 1146 312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 1790
Write 2,017
Mixed 1,955
SusWrite 1,735
424% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 91.8
312% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,428
DQ Write 1,174
DQ Mixed 1,266
957% 1,289 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 332%
Great: 365%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 137 136 136 133 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 439
Write 153
Mixed 202
SusWrite 131
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 36.4
139% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 119
102% 151 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
119GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 216 214 211 215 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 354
Write 244
Mixed 299
SusWrite 212
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 36.7
145% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 210
161% 219 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
581GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 463 463 464 463 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 46.8
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 40.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 128%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback