Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 03:43
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$438
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 165
2-Core 323
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,196
108% 908 Pts
64-Core 1,753
108% 1,753 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 155
Parallax 157
129% 157 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 134
Splatting 120
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
625GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1562 2206 2188 2292 2296 2287 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 1,800
Write 2,347
Mixed 1,962
SusWrite 2,139
467% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 91.6
322% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 1,185
870% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 352%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
529GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2207 2218 2228 2223 1670 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 1,843
Write 1,881
Mixed 1929
SusWrite 1,787
420% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 87.8
306% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,439
DQ Write 953
DQ Mixed 1,197
893% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 330%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
526GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 464 463 465 464 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
169GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 207 110 217 213 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 375
Write 281
Mixed 288
SusWrite 198
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 40.8
151% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 211
160% 217 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
61GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 133 143 153 152 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 414
Write 149
Mixed 201
SusWrite 143
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 24.7
89% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 106
89% 129 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 46.4
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 40
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $914
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback