Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 05:44
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$438
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 318
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1,171
106% 891 Pts
64-Core 2,188
135% 2,188 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 163
Parallax 181
136% 170 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 140
Splatting 124
125% 158 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 126%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
757GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2238 2229 2260 2342 2353 2335 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 2,344
Mixed 1,932
SusWrite 2293
473% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 91.6
314% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,361
DQ Write 1,149
DQ Mixed 1,239
932% 1,250 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 364%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
357GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2190 2214 2212 634 251 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 1,754
Write 2,314
Mixed 1,959
SusWrite 1,298
414% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 91.1
309% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,383
DQ Write 1235
DQ Mixed 1,315
984% 1,311 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 304%
Great: 365%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 139 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 377
Write 156
Mixed 189
SusWrite 146
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 26.3
91% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 120
104% 154 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
123GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 208 205 147 211 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 383
Write 292
Mixed 285
SusWrite 196
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 41
151% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 212
161% 218 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
832GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 462 464 462 463 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 46.8
MC Mixed 45.8
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 40.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 128%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback