Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 10:02
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,010
99% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,261
78% 1,261 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 128
Parallax 135
118% 136 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 132
Splatting 105
111% 140 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 113%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 535 334 333 334 332 331 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,479
Write 1,469
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 366
316% 1,431 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 93.6
329% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,386
DQ Mixed 1,008
810% 1,123 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 276%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
356GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 406 374 399 395 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 399
Mixed 331
SusWrite 396
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 43.1
154% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 243
207% 302 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 291 291 290 291 294 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,233
Write 294
Mixed 372
SusWrite 291
119% 547 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 42.4
213% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 422
366% 561 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 158%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
416GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 86.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 88.2
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 52.6%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 28.2
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 32.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 47.2
85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,574x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $140Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,195x
Core i7-8700Intel  $145Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,943x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,627x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,458x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,292x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples733x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples496x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples378x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 82%, 606,405 samples801x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples412x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples336x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $660
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback