TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 17:16
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 137
2-Core 268
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 830
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,096
68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 93.8%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 129
Parallax 127
110% 130 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 126
Splatting 99.7
108% 138 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 531 332 332 332 331 330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,402
Write 1,467
Mixed 1,310
SusWrite 365
307% 1,386 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 84.6
291% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,241
DQ Mixed 1,012
791% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 258%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
371GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 395 394 385 393 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 310
Mixed 314
SusWrite 389
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 40.9
145% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 237
202% 295 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 292 291 291 291 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,215
Write 294
Mixed 349
SusWrite 291
117% 537 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 39.6
193% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 411
360% 556 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 152%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
429GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 88.8
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 52.4%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 28
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 32.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 98.8%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $170Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,398x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,097x
Core i7-8700Intel  $162Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,875x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,578x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,413x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,247x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples710x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples486x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples365x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples781x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples398x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples326x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback