HP EliteBook 745 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8236
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180913
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 21:49
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8730B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 51.4
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 96.4
42% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 150
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8236) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.Q3
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.9
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 5.8
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 233 281 288 295 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 617
Write 301
Mixed 293
SusWrite 272
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 23.8
88% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 228
167% 221 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G4 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback