TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 14:02
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 300
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 977
96% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,240
77% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 0.42
Parallax 0.34
7% 3.06 fps
MRender 1.14
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.91
2% 1.72 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 5.04%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 329 327 331 328 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,341
Write 1,466
Mixed 1,113
SusWrite 364
292% 1,321 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 88
304% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 1,405
DQ Mixed 1,007
813% 1130 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 263%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
396GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 402 381 382 399 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 385
Mixed 274
SusWrite 395
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 39.9
147% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 248
203% 289 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 288 288 288 289 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 288
Mixed 337
SusWrite 288
116% 535 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 38.4
197% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 965
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 412
360% 555 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 153%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
442GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 88 85 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 85.6
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 50.2%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 27.6
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 32.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 46.9
85% 46.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $189Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,466x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,129x
Core i7-8700Intel  $160Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,895x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,592x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,425x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,263x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples721x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $109Bench 112%, 602,853 samples490x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples371x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 82%, 606,405 samples790x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 85%, 653,654 samples403x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples328x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $677
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback