Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 21:42
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 149
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 922
94% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,214
75% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 125
Parallax 127
102% 125 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 124
Splatting 101
106% 134 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 330 329 329 326 327 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,392
Write 1,437
Mixed 1,195
SusWrite 355
297% 1,345 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 83.4
286% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 1,371
DQ Mixed 1,008
808% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 258%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
396GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 468 468 459 471 470 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 20.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 465
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.9
206% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 294
241% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 128%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 287 287 287 288 287 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,226
Write 287
Mixed 333
SusWrite 287
116% 533 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 39.2
195% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 411
359% 555 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 152%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
442GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 84 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 87.6
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 50.9%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 27.7
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 32.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 50.2
80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 98.6%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $170Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,525x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,163x
Core i7-8700Intel  $152Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,914x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,613x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,442x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,275x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples726x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples491x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples376x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 82%, 606,405 samples794x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 85%, 653,654 samples411x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples335x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $657
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback