Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 24 '19 at 00:45
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 97.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
101% 183 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 998
94% 778 Pts
64-Core 1,246
77% 1,246 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 4.44
1% 3.13 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 45
Splatting 105
88% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 30.4%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 526 329 332 330 328 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,372
Write 1,466
Mixed 1,142
SusWrite 363
295% 1,336 MB/s
4K Read 66.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 89.6
306% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,367
DQ Mixed 1,009
808% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 264%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
397GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 406 403 404 380 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 394
Mixed 327
SusWrite 397
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 40.8
151% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 249
209% 302 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 291 290 291 291 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 292
Mixed 343
SusWrite 291
117% 538 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 40.3
202% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 965
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 408
359% 555 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 155%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
442GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 86 87 88 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 93
Write 89.3
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 84.3
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 51%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 27.7
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 32.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 47.7
84% 47.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,574x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $140Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,195x
Core i7-8700Intel  $145Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,943x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,627x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,458x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,292x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples733x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples496x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples378x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 82%, 606,405 samples801x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples412x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples336x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $660
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback