TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMar 27 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 927
94% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 2.25
0% 4.08 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 0.82%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 598 329 330 330 327 320 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,454
Write 1466
Mixed 1,151
SusWrite 372
300% 1,361 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 87.7
302% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 1,410
DQ Mixed 1,008
814% 1,132 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 267%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
397GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 465 470 469 464 468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 13.8
Mixed 431
SusWrite 466
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.1
188% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 296
241% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 124%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 289 289 290 289 289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,231
Write 289
Mixed 338
SusWrite 289
117% 537 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 39.9
200% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 414
361% 557 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 154%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
442GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 92 92 92 93 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 89
Write 32.7
Mixed 32
SusWrite 87.7
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 50.7%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 27.8
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 32.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $170Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,398x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,097x
Core i7-8700Intel  $185Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,875x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,578x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,413x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,247x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples710x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples486x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples365x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples781x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples398x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples326x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback