Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 22:47
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 985
92% 763 Pts
64-Core 1245
77% 1245 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 99.3%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.7% Above average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 55.8
48% 61.4 fps
MRender 85
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 77.7
61% 74.1 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 52.7%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 330 331 328 331 330 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,343
Write 1467
Mixed 1013
SusWrite 359
286% 1,296 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 63.7
230% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,364
DQ Mixed 1,012
808% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 238%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
370GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 464 469 464 468 433 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 469
Mixed 449
SusWrite 458
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 55.1
142% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 294
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
220GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 291 291 291 289 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,212
Write 293
Mixed 350
SusWrite 290
117% 536 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 33.5
187% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 927
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 416
355% 539 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 148%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
436GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 89 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 89
59% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 52.5%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 27.8
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 32.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 47
85% 47 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $190Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,498x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,144x
Core i7-8700Intel  $160Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,904x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,601x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,433x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,266x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples725x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples491x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples375x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 82%, 606,405 samples793x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 85%, 653,654 samples408x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples329x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $678
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback