TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 22:36
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 955
95% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,221
76% 1,221 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.2% Below average
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 0.19
0% 1.47 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 117
Splatting 94.3
100% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 34.2%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 544 327 331 329 331 331 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,451
Write 1470
Mixed 1,157
SusWrite 366
300% 1,361 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 91
316% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,425
DQ Mixed 1,010
817% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 271%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
397GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 451 467 469 445 397 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 462
Mixed 449
SusWrite 449
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.4
194% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 296
241% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 125%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 288 290 290 291 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 293
Mixed 354
SusWrite 290
118% 543 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 41.4
206% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 420
365% 561 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 156%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
442GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 84 88 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 89
Mixed 51
SusWrite 87.7
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 50.6%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 28
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 33.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 47.5
84% 47.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $189Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,466x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,129x
Core i7-8700Intel  $160Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,895x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,592x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,425x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,263x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples721x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $109Bench 112%, 602,853 samples490x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples371x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 82%, 606,405 samples790x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 85%, 653,654 samples403x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples328x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $677
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback