TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 18:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 98
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,015
96% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 114
Parallax 118
98% 117 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 114
Splatting 93.8
100% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 98.3%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 586 330 330 331 331 328 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,452
Write 1,466
Mixed 1,116
SusWrite 373
298% 1,352 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 88.7
305% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,377
DQ Mixed 1,005
808% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 268%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
397GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 459 457 472 472 463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 467
Mixed 445
SusWrite 462
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 58
191% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 297
242% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 125%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 289 288 289 290 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1237
Write 290
Mixed 345
SusWrite 289
118% 540 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 39
200% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 413
361% 557 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 154%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
442GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 91 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 47.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 92.8
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 53.2%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 27.6
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 32.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 46.1
87% 46.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $170Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,398x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,097x
Core i7-8700Intel  $185Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,875x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,578x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,413x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,247x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples710x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples486x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples365x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples781x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples398x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples326x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback