Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 18:57
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 270
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 978
89% 747 Pts
64-Core 1,224
76% 1,224 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 96.6%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 127
Parallax 13.4
107% 90.4 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 129
Splatting 106
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 544 331 332 333 338 329 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,434
Write 1,471
Mixed 1,392
SusWrite 368
313% 1,416 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 86.7
298% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 1,012
769% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 258%
 Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
371GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 463 464 470 469 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 355
Mixed 330
SusWrite 448
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 41.8
155% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 242
205% 298 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXV72H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 290 290 290 290 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,225
Write 292
Mixed 350
SusWrite 290
117% 539 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 41.6
200% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 965
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 411
360% 556 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 154%
 Great: 153%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
429GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 90 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 93.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 89
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 52.1%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 25.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 31.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 49.6
81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 92.7%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $170Bench 88%, 746,287 samples5,525x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples3,163x
Core i7-8700Intel  $152Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,914x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,613x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,442x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia  $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples1,275x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples726x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples491x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples376x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 82%, 606,405 samples794x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 85%, 653,654 samples411x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples335x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $657
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback