PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180608 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 14 '19 at 21:36 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | DZA-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 119 119 127 107 88 MB/s
|
80.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
8GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 80 80 78 80 79 MB/s
|
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
31GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 121 127 122 120 120 MB/s
|
71.1%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
9GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 36 33 32 29 MB/s
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 847x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 630x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 293x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 300x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 238x |
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 227x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $446 |