Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 20:04
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 194
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 664
63% 523 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (69 fps cap detected)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 65
57% 68.3 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 68.8
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 457
Mixed 316
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 43.2
155% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 218
163% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
3GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84
Write 84.7
Mixed 46.5
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 121 125 122 122 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 121
Write 122
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 124
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
31GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 47 52 57 56 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 40.3
Write 43.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 49.7
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 18.7
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $444
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback