Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 20:10
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 193
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 660
64% 525 Pts
64-Core 660
41% 660 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2258 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 69.8
60% 72.5 fps
MRender 76.4
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 73.9
60% 73.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 445
Mixed 319
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 42.7
153% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 219
164% 217 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
3GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.8
Write 67.5
Mixed 50.7
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 123 128 124 122 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 130
Write 118
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 126
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
31GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 48 52 59 56 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 43.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 50
30% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $444
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback