Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 22:55
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 660
62% 517 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 69
Parallax 65.1
57% 68 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 70.2
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 455
Mixed 330
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 41
153% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 218
163% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
1GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85
Write 78.3
Mixed 46.5
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 121 128 123 120 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69% Good
Read 115
Write 118
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 125
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
31GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 48 52 59 56 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 43
Mixed 32
SusWrite 49.9
30% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $446
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback