Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 09:29
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 650
62% 515 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2282 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 133 132 126 69 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 482
Write 443
Mixed 318
SusWrite 120
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 38.2
147% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 218
163% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
8GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 82 74 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 69
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 77.5
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 120 125 121 118 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 123
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
31GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 48 52 58 52 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 40.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 49.4
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback