Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180608
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '19 at 18:20
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 152 53% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 572 52% 436 Pts	64-Core 587 36% 587 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3721) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 48% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB 2,164 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT03L0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 431 Write 431 Mixed 316 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 39.1 139% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 216 162% 214 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 3GB free Firmware: JP2OA3GH Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 82 Write 83.8 Mixed 50.3 54% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$35 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 29GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 119 124 123 122 127 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 114 Write 118 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 124 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38 10,520 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 31GB free Firmware: 3CNR SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 47 51 58 56 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 41.3 Write 43 Mixed 29 SusWrite 49.8 30% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.2% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 18.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 16.8 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	847x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	630x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	293x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	300x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $212Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	238x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	227x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	92x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	76x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	182x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	129x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16