Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180608
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 204 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 602 59% 484 Pts	64-Core 587 36% 587 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3721) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 48% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB 2,164 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT03L0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 472 Write 433 Mixed 310 90% 405 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 41.6 148% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 218 163% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1GB free Firmware: JP2OA3GH Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 71.3 Write 69.3 Mixed 44.8 46% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 29GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 126 123 121 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 122 Write 120 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 124 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38 10,520 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 31GB free Firmware: 3CNR SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 47 50 57 53 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 39.5 Write 40.3 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 48.3 29% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 19.1 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 17.7 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	848x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	631x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	294x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	301x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	238x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	227x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	92x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	182x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	129x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $427

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16