Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '19 at 16:57
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 212
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 552
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 65.1
57% 68.2 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 71
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 424
Mixed 326
91% 411 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 43.1
149% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 217
163% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
20GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 97 109 122 113 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 71
Write 77
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 109
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
25GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 124 129 122 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 128
Mixed 79
SusWrite 127
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
88GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 68 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 74
Write 67
Mixed 46
SusWrite 69
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 42%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
290GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 73.3
Write 74
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 78.5
83% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback