Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 09:15
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 649
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2282 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 122 131 52 51 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 486
Write 453
Mixed 320
SusWrite 104
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 40.5
150% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 219
163% 217 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
8GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 79 76 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41% Average
Read 64.8
Write 61.7
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 78.2
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41%
Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 120 127 122 122 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 125
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
31GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 47 51 59 56 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 44
Mixed 33
SusWrite 49.9
31% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $444
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback