Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 00:49
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 189
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 304
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 41.4
28% 35.8 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 32
Splatting 35.8
28% 33.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 650 648 651 651 643 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,773
Write 1,257
Mixed 643
SusWrite 681
242% 1,089 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 56.8
211% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 684
538% 750 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 212%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 314 310 311 309 309 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 442
Mixed 381
SusWrite 324
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56.8
192% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
410GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 102 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 87.4
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 101
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 177 175 177 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 161
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 176
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback