| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 11.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190308 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 12 '20 at 02:08 |
| Run Duration | 736 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.8%
Good
|
74% 130 Pts
|
42% 336 Pts
|
29% 469 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 870C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
91.2%
Outstanding
|
90% 97.1 fps
|
95% 119 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 71 11 17 61 13 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
16% 72.7 MB/s
|
14% 4.23 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
86GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 133 77 43 87 MB/s
|
70.3%
Very good
|
86% 117 MB/s
|
124% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
49.6%
Average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
51% 78.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,706 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,070x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 930x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 278x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 355x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 296x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 231x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $263 |