Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 08:00
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 197
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 289
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1230 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 23.7
12% 19.1 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 9
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 618 610 606 608 593 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,867
Write 1,392
Mixed 542
SusWrite 644
246% 1,111 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 50.5
192% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 560
420% 563 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 198%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 313 309 311 310 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 466
Mixed 378
SusWrite 324
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 54.1
180% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 349
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
414GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 56 35 56 63 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 57.3
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
737GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 146 150 148 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 162
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 148
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 21
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback