Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '18 at 00:06
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 179
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 296
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 41.2
28% 35.6 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 35.8
28% 33.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 648 649 652 651 641 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,812
Write 1,477
Mixed 628
SusWrite 674
255% 1,148 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 56.7
212% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 490
DQ Mixed 548
412% 553 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 203%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 312 309 311 311 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 435
Mixed 384
SusWrite 319
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 54.4
181% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 345
262% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
414GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 66
SusWrite 96.4
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
737GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 149 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 162
Write 157
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 148
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback