Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '18 at 18:29
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 168
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 304
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1230 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 23.1
12% 19 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 8.96
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 824 593 598 600 599 593 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,460
Write 1,566
Mixed 708
SusWrite 634
244% 1,092 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53.5
194% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 493
388% 541 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 182%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 313 312 313 313 313 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 420
Mixed 380
SusWrite 325
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 48.8
166% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 350
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
418GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 111
Write 98.7
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 92.6
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
737GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 149 149 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 147
Write 164
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 149
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.5% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback