Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 14:47
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 173
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 284
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 32
Parallax 41.7
28% 36.1 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 35.9
28% 33.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 802 640 633 651 641 630 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,928
Write 1,610
Mixed 616
SusWrite 666
268% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 51.2
190% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 544
411% 554 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 201%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 310 310 313 312 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 418
Mixed 373
SusWrite 321
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 50.7
177% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
414GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 98 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 96.6
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
737GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 141 149 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 164
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 148
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback