Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 15:27
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 159
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 289
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 41.6
28% 35.9 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 35.8
28% 33.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 647 650 652 650 638 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,966
Write 1,568
Mixed 692
SusWrite 677
272% 1,226 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 50.7
206% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 619
DQ Write 473
DQ Mixed 533
402% 542 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 207%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 313 312 311 308 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 458
Mixed 388
SusWrite 321
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 54.1
182% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 345
261% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
414GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 95.9
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
737GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 145 146 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 164
Write 160
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 148
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback