Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '18 at 10:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 111
2-Core 187
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 304
41% 303 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 39.8
26% 33.9 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 35
27% 32.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 841 644 641 647 642 642 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1852
Write 1,624
Mixed 586
SusWrite 676
263% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 64.3
214% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 552
418% 564 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 208%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 313 312 310 310 309 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 467
Mixed 375
SusWrite 323
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 55.5
186% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 352
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
418GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 98 98 97 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 96
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
737GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 143 150 150 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 162
Write 165
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 149
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback