Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '18 at 00:20
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 135
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 285
33% 258 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 41.4
28% 35.8 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 35.7
28% 33.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 643 647 649 651 644 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 1,599
Mixed 628
SusWrite 671
270% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 56.2
211% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 542
410% 552 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 209%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 310 308 309 311 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 463
Mixed 389
SusWrite 318
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 55
184% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 351
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
414GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 99 97 98 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 68
SusWrite 96.4
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
737GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 150 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 157
Write 164
Mixed 39
SusWrite 149
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 24%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback