Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 02 '18 at 23:57
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 260
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 41
28% 35.4 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 35.5
27% 32.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 694 609 630 623 636 619 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,751
Write 1,554
Mixed 661
SusWrite 635
256% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 60.8
209% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 520
393% 530 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 198%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 311 311 313 313 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 454
Mixed 388
SusWrite 317
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 52.8
177% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 349
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
410GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 95 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 61
SusWrite 96
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 175 175 177 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 168
Mixed 40
SusWrite 176
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback