Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results


Gaming 162% UFO	Desktop 122% UFO	Workstation 169% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4 (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '23 at 21:20
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394 5,633 User benchmarks, average bench 121% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	122% Outstanding	Memory 90.9 1-Core 217 2-Core 428 128% 245 Pts	4-Core 817 8-Core 1,400 134% 1,108 Pts	64-Core 2,110 131% 2,110 Pts
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 125%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% MSI(1462 C972) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 4138 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Lighting 184 Reflection 177 Parallax 166 150% 176 fps	MRender 212 Gravity 136 Splatting 118 122% 155 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 376GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 484 485 486 486 488 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 486 Mixed 470 SusWrite 486 110% 489 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 65.1 223% 82.2 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 341 257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2097 2118 658 192 203 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	321% Outstanding	Read 1,760 Write 2,056 Mixed 1,761 SusWrite 909 365% 1,621 MB/s	4K Read 71.9 4K Write 272 4K Mixed 108 392% 151 MB/s	DQ Read 1,602 DQ Write 1,762 DQ Mixed 1,240 1,056% 1,535 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 321% Great: 295%
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 29GB free Firmware: SAFM22.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 426 375 345 433 466 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 321 Mixed 315 SusWrite 409 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 38.6 154% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 167 157% 243 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 158GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 484 486 487 413 281 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 487 Mixed 466 SusWrite 440 107% 476 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 64.5 224% 82.4 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 342 246% 314 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 54GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 101 100 114 115 115 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 114 Write 120 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 102 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 47GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 97 104 105 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 103 Write 111 Mixed 94.7 SusWrite 103 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	MC Read 57.3 MC Write 55.6 MC Mixed 53.8 159% 55.6 GB/s	SC Read 29.7 SC Write 52.8 SC Mixed 39.5 116% 40.7 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 117% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 147%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 119%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $120Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	354x
Core i5-12600KIntel $176Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	323x
Core i5-12400Intel $146Bench 98%, 17,352 samples	193x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	195x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	179x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	174x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	90x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	78x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	62x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GBGBench 94%, 11,497 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $593

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16