Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H670-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 09:43
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 216
2-Core 429
128% 246 Pts
4-Core 848
8-Core 1,489
141% 1,169 Pts
64-Core 2,368
146% 2,368 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4138 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 181
Parallax 170
154% 180 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
125% 158 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
242GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 477 478 485 485 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 363
Mixed 458
SusWrite 482
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.1
210% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 340
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,693
Write 2,112
Mixed 1,765
417% 1,857 MB/s
4K Read 69.1
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 102
362% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,595
DQ Write 1,369
DQ Mixed 1,222
987% 1,395 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
GOODRAM 240GB
1GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 442
Mixed 326
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 38.4
152% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 168
156% 240 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
173GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 489 488 489 409 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 486
Mixed 464
SusWrite 441
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 61.9
212% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 129%
Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
54GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 116 114 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 114
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
47GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 105 104 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 103
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4533 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 57.1
MC Mixed 55.2
163% 57.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 52.5
SC Mixed 40.9
117% 41.1 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 153%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback