Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H670-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 00:08
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 217
2-Core 431
127% 245 Pts
4-Core 816
8-Core 1,397
134% 1,106 Pts
64-Core 2,150
133% 2,150 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 170
Parallax 161
146% 170 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 131
Splatting 113
113% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
375GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 488 488 490 490 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 485
Mixed 466
SusWrite 488
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 62.2
212% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,756
Write 2,102
Mixed 1,763
420% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 99.7
354% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,598
DQ Write 1,372
DQ Mixed 1,231
992% 1,400 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
GOODRAM 240GB
1GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 464
Mixed 324
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 38.2
151% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 166
163% 258 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
173GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 488 488 491 411 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 486
Mixed 445
SusWrite 441
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 61.3
210% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 128%
Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
39GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 120 126 124 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 122
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
34GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 103 105 108 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 109
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 105
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 48.6
145% 50.6 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 53.3
SC Mixed 37.7
113% 39.7 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 137%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback