Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results


Gaming 164% UFO	Desktop 121% UFO	Workstation 177% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4 (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '23 at 00:52
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394 5,633 User benchmarks, average bench 121% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 215 2-Core 429 127% 245 Pts	4-Core 807 8-Core 1,442 135% 1,124 Pts	64-Core 2,267 140% 2,267 Pts
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 125%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% MSI(1462 C972) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 4138 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Lighting 191 Reflection 184 Parallax 174 155% 183 fps	MRender 219 Gravity 143 Splatting 122 127% 162 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 376GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 486 483 489 489 490 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 480 Mixed 462 SusWrite 487 109% 484 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 62.8 213% 77.7 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 340 256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2048 1347 261 296 196 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 1,629 Write 957 Mixed 1,761 SusWrite 721 284% 1,267 MB/s	4K Read 68.9 4K Write 243 4K Mixed 103 365% 138 MB/s	DQ Read 1,593 DQ Write 1,486 DQ Mixed 1,226 1,006% 1,435 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 295%
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 29GB free Firmware: SAFM22.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 418 404 422 384 429 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 465 Mixed 320 SusWrite 414 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 38 152% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 165 158% 247 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 158GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 486 483 490 414 283 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 485 Mixed 465 SusWrite 440 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 62.2 213% 77.8 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 340 256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 47GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 115 115 113 115 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 117 Write 79.3 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 113 72% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 40GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 108 107 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 83.5 Mixed 87.3 SusWrite 106 69% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	MC Read 57.7 MC Write 55.6 MC Mixed 53.2 159% 55.5 GB/s	SC Read 28.8 SC Write 53.2 SC Mixed 39.1 115% 40.4 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 117% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 147%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 119%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $120Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	354x
Core i5-12600KIntel $176Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	323x
Core i5-12400Intel $146Bench 98%, 17,352 samples	193x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	195x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	179x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	174x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	90x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	78x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	62x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GBGBench 94%, 11,497 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $593

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16