Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H670-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 87.7
1-Core 217
2-Core 427
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 850
8-Core 1,483
141% 1,167 Pts
64-Core 2383
148% 2383 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4138 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (80 fps cap detected)
65.3% Good
Lighting 80
Reflection 80
Parallax 80
65% 80 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 80
Splatting 80
66% 80 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
242GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 482 490 490 488 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 466
SusWrite 487
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 62.4
211% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,729
Write 2,132
Mixed 1,760
420% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 103
364% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,593
DQ Write 1,359
DQ Mixed 1221
985% 1,391 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
GOODRAM 240GB
1GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 459
Write 440
Mixed 323
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 38.4
152% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 166
147% 220 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
173GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 491 491 491 406 282 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 486
Mixed 464
SusWrite 442
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 61.9
213% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 340
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 129%
Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
54GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 115 115 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 108
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
47GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 106 104 103 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 111
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 91.2
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 53.7
158% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 52.7
SC Mixed 39.7
116% 40.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 149%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback