Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H670-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 22:07
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 214
2-Core 429
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 855
8-Core 1,475
141% 1,165 Pts
64-Core 2,354
146% 2,354 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 181
Parallax 170
154% 180 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
125% 158 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
475GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 485 485 487 487 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 487
Mixed 468
SusWrite 486
110% 489 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 64.8
223% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,712
Write 2112
Mixed 1,763
418% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 71.7
4K Write 272
4K Mixed 108
390% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,596
DQ Write 1,665
DQ Mixed 1,214
1,028% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
GOODRAM 240GB
50GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 427 406 301 361 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 463
Mixed 320
SusWrite 385
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 39.1
159% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 166
162% 254 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
181GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 486 486 487 414 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 488
Mixed 466
SusWrite 440
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 64.6
224% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 343
258% 347 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 132%
Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
54GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 113
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
48GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 94 94 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 109
Mixed 93
SusWrite 99.7
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 48.9
145% 50.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 52.8
SC Mixed 38.2
114% 39.9 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 138%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback