Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 10:10
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$304
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 212
2-Core 425
127% 243 Pts
4-Core 853
8-Core 1,620
147% 1,236 Pts
64-Core 2902
180% 2902 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 269
Parallax 289
234% 282 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 246
Splatting 192
211% 268 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 201%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AATCTE
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,279
Write 2,335
Mixed 1695
469% 2,103 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 108
386% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,452
DQ Write 1,492
DQ Mixed 679
729% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 370%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 848
Write 3.2
Mixed 5.2
191% 286 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Mixed 0
326% 29.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4BU016G-3200XG 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 39
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 27.8
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 219 59 60 23" 1280 720 HWP3283 HP Z23n
Typical GA-B760 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $818
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback